Don't get me wrong, I don't need to spend a grand on a laptop. I want a quality product that has a better chance of lasting and if the general opinion is that paying up to that price gets me that then I'm willing to.
Phil Thompson wrote: > not convinced. A lot of the extra price seems to go on executive > jewellery finishes, blu-ray drives, quad core processors that are no > faster than dual core, the latest Intel processor which is 70% more than > a perfectly adequate slightly older one etc etc. (or a picture of a > piece of fruit on it). > I'm assuming I'll have better utilisation/compatibility with a dual core under Linux than the latest processors (are you talking about the i3/i5/i7?) but can they provide comparable performance and are they as future proofed? Stewart _______________________________________________ Peterboro mailing list Peterboro@mailman.lug.org.uk https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro
