Re: plaintive whine about 'for' syntax

[Damian Conway]

Dave Storrs wrote:

	for @a; @b -> $x is rw; $y { $x = $y[5] };

I agree that it's an eyeful.  How many of your issues could be solved
if the above were just written:

	for (@a;@b) -> ($x is rw; $y) { $x = $y[5] };

Would that suffice to make it clearer?

Actually, yes, that would solve everything for me...and I knew
this was valid syntax.

So is this vertical layout, which I think will become fairly standard
amongst those who care about readability:

	for @a       ; @b
         -> $x is rw ; $y   { $x = $y[5] };

Damian