Re: plaintive whine about 'for' syntax

[Michael Lazzaro]

On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 12:48  PM, Dave Storrs wrote:

	for @a; @b -> $x is rw; $y { $x = $y[5] };

I agree that it's an eyeful. How many of your issues could be solved if the above were just written:

for (@a;@b) -> ($x is rw; $y) { $x = $y[5] };


Would that suffice to make it clearer?

MikeL