On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Unfortunately, the perl6-language archive doesn't seem to go back far > enough to cover the .perlrc discussion. Is the old archive still > around? don't know which archive you are talking about, but http://archive.develooper.com/perl6-language%40perl.org/ should have all mails sent to perl6-language from it's start to a few days ago when I moved stuff around. http://archive.develooper.com/perl6-language%40perl.org/msg00002.html - ask -- ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do(); more than 100M impressions per day, http://valueclick.com
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Tim Bunce
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Simon Cozens
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Damian Conway
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) John Porter