On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 12:49:28PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 05:37 PM 4/29/2001 +0100, Michael G Schwern wrote: > >By "optional" I take it you mean an admin can choose to define their > >own site policy or not? > > No. Optional in that you have to do a "use SomePolicyThingWeHaventDecided;" > to put it in force. Ahh, ok. Carry on then. :) -- Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Perl6 Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One OH GOD!! It's LINUX! All you Linux fanboys go wild! It never crashes! It'll wash your underpants! It'll eat your dog for you, if you want your dog to be eaten! It'll make you attractive and smell good and... it'll... uh... uh. Man, I'm so sick of this shit. http://www.goats.com/archive/000602.html
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Damian Conway
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Tim Bunce
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Simon Cozens
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Damian Conway
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) John Porter