At 05:37 PM 4/29/2001 +0100, Michael G Schwern wrote: >On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 11:44:24AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > At 04:30 PM 4/29/2001 +0100, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > >To use a Perl 5 example, consider the simple setting of "use strict" > > >as a general site policy. Basicaly, most of the Perl code in your > > >/usr/bin will explode when you try to run it. > > > > Right, that's why the policy stuff we're discussing is optional... :) > >Ugg, we're definately rehashing the .perlrc discussion now. :( > >By "optional" I take it you mean an admin can choose to define their >own site policy or not? No. Optional in that you have to do a "use SomePolicyThingWeHaventDecided;" to put it in force. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Damian Conway
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Tim Bunce
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Simon Cozens
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Damian Conway
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) John Porter