On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 02:36:40PM -0400, John Porter wrote: > I balk at the proposition of Yet Another Namespace. Where? > > It also means that every operator has a function name, > > I would think that would be the case, regardless of the > form the general operator syntax takes. And functions have attributes, so no new namespace. -- DESPAIR: It's Always Darkest Just Before it Gets Pitch Black http://www.despair.com
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Paul Johnson
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Graham Barr
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Larry Wall
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Siracusa
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Kirrily Robert
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Graham Barr
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jonathan Scott Duff