Larry Wall wrote: > There will probably be optional modifiers before colon > for various reasons. This has the result that we could distinguish an > inner:* operator from and outer:* operator. I balk at the proposition of Yet Another Namespace. > It also means that every operator has a function name, I would think that would be the case, regardless of the form the general operator syntax takes. > It might even mean that we can have a URL literal type, I trust that you will think long and hard about that. > if there's any good reason to treat a URL as more than > just a string And that is what's illuminating, imho. -- John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Graham Barr
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Johan Vromans
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Paul Johnson
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Graham Barr
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Larry Wall
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Siracusa
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Kirrily Robert
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Graham Barr
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter