On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 03:32:56PM -0400, John Porter wrote: > Jonathan Scott Duff wrote: > > Doesn't look like another namespace, but rather an extension of an > > existing one to me. > > An extension of a namespace? What's that? > Either "modifiers" will be symbols in an existing namespace, > or they will be in their own namespace. I was rather thinking that we could extend the subroutine namespace to include the funny symbols and that modifiers would exist there. -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Graham Barr
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Adam Turoff
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 nick
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Richard Proctor
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 nick