anonymous troll wrote: > > yet another _example_ of perl's "expert vs. newbie" snobbery. It's simply a design decision. And there's plenty of reason for thinking it's the better way to decide. "Make something idiot-proof..." But s/idiot/newbie/. > the "perl mindset": it's what's now driving perl toward the unix > programming language "dustbin"...by driving "newbies" away. If Perl goes the way of the dinosaur, it won't be because some people found it hard to learn. > >>>Expert-friendly languages are most often only befriended > >>>by experts. Nothing wrong with that. Experts deserve a language that rises to their abilities and demands. -- John Porter
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and defa... yaphet jones
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... Simon Cozens
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... John Porter
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... yaphet jones
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... yaphet jones
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures... Simon Cozens
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... John Porter
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... Russ Allbery
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... yaphet jones
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... David Grove
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... David Grove
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and... David Grove