Uri Guttman wrote: > >>>>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > DS> So unless we come up with something concrete, the goals are: > > DS> 1) A nebulous ~10% faster > DS> 2) Faster in the things that annoy Dan the most > DS> 3) Faster in the OO bits the folks upstairs from me use > > 4. faster internal and language level I/O (of course driven by AIO. :) > 5. faster startup via bytecode and/or TIL > 6. Quantum::Superposition::ForReal 7. Faster operations on numeric arrays (eg add 2 lists of numbers) BTW, although Quantum::Superposition::ForReal is tough (because it relies on existentially-challenged Quantum Computers), Quantum::Superposition::PrettyDamnFast is a possibility. Using pipelined operations on single CPU machines, and parallelising on multi-CPU machines, would be quite effective for Q::S.
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Dan Sugalski
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Uri Guttman
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Nathan Torkington
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Uri Guttman
- Acceptable speeds (was Re: TIL... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re:... Uri Guttman
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re:... Adam Turoff
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re:... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re:... Uri Guttman
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re:... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re:... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re:... Steve Fink
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... John Porter
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Uri Guttman
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Russ Allbery
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Simon Cozens
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Dan Sugalski
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Uri Guttman
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Adam Turoff
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What wi... Uri Guttman
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? Jerrad Pierce