On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 08:33:23PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > so the TIL generated code would still to parameter setup, then an > indirect function call and then result handling. it should still be > faster than an interpreter and simpler to generate than fully compiled > code. Is this actually, in any sense of the word, true? I mean, given three-address code, I find anything equally difficult to generate. I don't see anything that distinguishes this from the ordinary process of generating code with a runtime library and a stack. -- DEC diagnostics would run on a dead whale. -- Mel Ferentz
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re: TIL... Uri Guttman
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re: TIL... Adam Turoff
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re: TIL... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re: TIL... Uri Guttman
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re: TIL... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re: TIL... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Acceptable speeds (was Re: TIL... Steve Fink
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will t... John Porter
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will t... Uri Guttman
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will t... Russ Allbery
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will t... Simon Cozens
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will t... Uri Guttman
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will t... Adam Turoff
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will t... Uri Guttman
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? Jerrad Pierce
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? foo . bar