Nathan Wiger wrote: > (And if the RFC is proposing autoquoting only barewords, then I think > that's _really_ inconsistent and should not be done.) Isn't autoquoting only barewords precisely the type of autoquoting that => does? So there is a precedent. I've been assuming all along that that is exactly what the RFC is proposing. -- Glenn ===== Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there. -- Will Rogers _____NetZero Free Internet Access and Email______ http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
- RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer from the a... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer f... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer f... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suff... John Porter
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer f... John Porter
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suff... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer f... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suff... Ilya Zakharevich
- Why -> cannot autoquote the LHS (was Re: RFC 2... Nathan Wiger
- Accessing perl's command line switches Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suff... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer f... Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suff... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not ... Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls sh... Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not ... Tom Christiansen