Ilya Zakharevich wrote: > > Why not use ->? > > $IO::STDERR->print @stuff; > print $IO::STDERR @stuff; Ok, something here is extreme confused. Is not the second form an instance of indirect object syntax? > ================================================================== > This would cause about 80% of Nathan's RFCs to die screaming, since > they nearly all rely on indirect object syntax. > ================================================================== > > This is why I stole my time from other things to write this RFC. Please explain what you mean. -Nate
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer from the ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer from the ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer from... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer from the ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer from... Ilya Zakharevich
- Why -> cannot autoquote the LHS (was Re: RFC 244 (v1) ... Nathan Wiger
- Accessing perl's command line switches Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Why -> cannot autoquote the LHS (was Re: RFC ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer from the ... Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer from... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer ... Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suf... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not... Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer ... Tom Christiansen