Nathan Wiger wrote: > > This RFC proposes to remove indirect object syntax > > Please show me how to write: > > print STDERR @stuff; > > without it, while keeping it a method of the STDERR filehandle, and > without requiring ->. Hopefully STDERR as a "filehandle" is going away. Assuming it is replaced by $stderr or stderr(), then clearly you could write $stderr->print @stuff; or stderr()->print @stuff; -- John Porter We're building the house of the future together.
- RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer from the a... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer f... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer f... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suff... John Porter
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer f... John Porter
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suff... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer f... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suff... Ilya Zakharevich
- Why -> cannot autoquote the LHS (was Re: RFC 2... Nathan Wiger
- Accessing perl's command line switches Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Why -> cannot autoquote the LHS (was R... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer f... Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suff... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not ... Ilya Zakharevich