Thanks to everyone for their valuable feedback on this RFC. Clearly the proposed solution is not adequate, perhaps because it does not address the central issue that iterators really ought to be stateful objects, rather than statefree functions. I don't have time to rework the proposal from scratch, so the alternatives are: 1. I retract the RFC, and we live with the problem 2. I freeze the RFC, having added an Unresolved Problems section 3. Someone else takes it over and fixes it properly Preferences? Suggestions? Volunteers? Damian
- RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hashes Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hashes Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hash... Dave Storrs
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested ... Tom Hughes
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hashes Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hash... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hash... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hash... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hashes Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hashes Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hash... Bart Lateur