Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hashes

[Tom Christiansen]

>This RFC proposes that the internal cursor iterated by the C<each> function 
>be stored in the pad of the block containing the C<each>, rather than
>being stored within the hash being iterated.

Then how do you specify which iterator is to be reset when you wish 
to do that?  Currently, you do this by specifying the hash.  If the
iterator is no longer affiliated with the hash, but the opcode node,
then what are you going to do?  

--tom