> >This RFC proposes that the internal cursor iterated by the C<each> > >function be stored in the pad of the block containing the C<each>, > >rather than being stored within the hash being iterated. > > Then how do you specify which iterator is to be reset when you wish > to do that? Currently, you do this by specifying the hash. > If the iterator is no longer affiliated with the hash, but the opcode node, Just to note: in version 2 of the RFC, it's associated with the pad of the block in which the C<each> appears. > then what are you going to do? The short answer is that there is no "manual" reset of iterators. Damian
- RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hashes Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hashes Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hash... Dave Storrs
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested ... Tom Hughes
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hashes Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hash... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hash... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hash... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hashes Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hashes Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 255 (v2) Fix iteration of nested hash... Bart Lateur