Larry Wall wrote: > > I'd entertain a proposal that ... be made a valid term that happens > to do nothing, so that you can run your examples through perl -c for > syntax checks. Or better, make it an official "stub" for rapid > prototyping, with some way of getting a warning whenever you execute > such a stub. Has anyone done an RFC on this yet? If not, I'll volunteer. -- John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Damian Conway
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: ... as a term Damian Conway
- Re: ... as a term Larry Wall
- Re: ... as a term Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Larry Wall
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Do we really need eq? John Porter
- Re: Do we really need eq? Steve Simmons
- Re: Do we really need eq? John Porter
- Re: Do we really need eq? David L. Nicol
- Re: Do we really need eq? Peter Scott
- Re: Do we really need eq? Tom Christiansen
- Re: Do we really need eq? Andy Dougherty
- attributes definable as well as value... David L. Nicol
- Re: Do we really need eq? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Do we really need eq? Lipscomb, Al
- Re: Do we really need eq? Nathan Wiger