Damian Conway wrote: > > Easy. I'll just add a C<thing> operator to Q::S. It would take no > arguments and return a (lazy?) list of every possible Perl subroutine. > > PS: Can you tell whether I'm joking? I think you're both joking AND not joking, at the same time. -- John Porter We're building the house of the future together.
- Do we really need eq? Ed Mills
- Re: Do we really need eq? Nathan Torkington
- Re: Do we really need eq? Spider Boardman
- Re: Do we really need eq? Randal L. Schwartz
- ... as a term Larry Wall
- Re: ... as a term Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: ... as a term Nathan Torkington
- Re: ... as a term skud
- Re: ... as a term Damian Conway
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: ... as a term Damian Conway
- Re: ... as a term Larry Wall
- Re: ... as a term Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Larry Wall
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: Do we really need eq? Steve Simmons