Re: ... as a term

[John Porter]

Larry Wall wrote:
> 
> Either that, or it's a funny unary operator that can take 0 or 1 argument.
> 
> But I'd be happy with just ... as a statement.  Dwimming the unary
> operator may not be worth it.  Especially since it might be confused
> with the binary operator.  

Could you make it "evaporate" and compile time, just like the (proposed) qc()?

And if it is an operator, it should commute its context.  (Hopefully this would
"just happen" if the ... evaporates.)

-- 
John Porter

        We're building the house of the future together.