Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking

[Mark Cogan]

At 11:05 PM 8/15/00 -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 08:59:25PM -0700, Mark Cogan wrote:
> > At 11:43 PM 8/15/00 -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> > >Counter example:        @a = \($a, $b, $c);
> >
> > I guess I'm missing the point; how is this different from
> >
> > @a = [$a,$b,$c];
>
>Well, I've lost the point of this thread, but
>
>         @a = \($a, $b, $c);
>
>is equivalent to
>
>         @a = (\$a, \$b, \$c);
>
>rather than what you wrote.

Ah, so it is. I'd argue that that's broken and should be handled with map 
or for.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Cogan    [EMAIL PROTECTED]                     +1-520-881-8101     
ArtToday      www.arttoday.com