>>>>> "MC" == Mark Cogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> is equivalent to >> >> @a = (\$a, \$b, \$c); >> >> rather than what you wrote. MC> Ah, so it is. I'd argue that that's broken and should be handled with map MC> or for. Err, That's not an accident. Larry designed that in. <chaim> -- Chaim Frenkel Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
- Component wise || and RFC 82 (was Re: RFC 104... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Component wise || and RFC 82 (was Re:... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Component wise || and RFC 82 (was... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Mark Cogan
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Mark Cogan
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Mark Cogan
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Mark Cogan
- Uses for array notation (was Re:... Chaim Frenkel
- Uses for array notation (was Re:... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Mark Cogan
- Array notation (was Re: RFC 104 ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 82 (scalar ops consistent in ... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking raptor