Jeremy Howard writes: > @result = @a || @b; > > Which applies '||' component-wise to elements of @a and @b, placing the > result in @result. *Ptui* That's not how *I* want || to behave on lists/arrays. I want @result = @a || @b; to be like: (@result = @a) or (@result = @b); That's what all my students keep expecting it to mean. Nat
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking raptor
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking:example raptor
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking John Porter
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking raptor
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking John Porter
- Component wise || and RFC 82 (was Re: RFC 104 (v1) Bac... Nathan Torkington
- Component wise || and RFC 82 (was Re: RFC 104 (v1... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Component wise || and RFC 82 (was Re: RFC... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Component wise || and RFC 82 (was Re:... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Mark Cogan
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Mark Cogan
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Mark Cogan
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Mark Cogan