Damian Conway wrote:
>
> So how is that different from:
>
> do BLOCK1 until do BLOCK2
>
> ???
Because if BLOCK1 ever evaluates to False, the operation terminates.
It's more like
do { r = f1() } until ( not r or f2() );
--
John Porter
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking raptor
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking:example raptor
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking John Porter
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking raptor
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking John Porter
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Nathan Torkington
- Component wise || and RFC 82 (was Re: RFC 104 (v1... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Component wise || and RFC 82 (was Re: RFC... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Component wise || and RFC 82 (was Re:... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Mark Cogan
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Mark Cogan
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Mark Cogan
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Jonathan Scott Duff
