Tom Christiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> >True, but maybe a lower precedance keword is needed like we did
> >or || and &&. I think someone suggested "then"
> 
> >  print $string1, $string2, "\n" then return 3 if $cond;
> 
> >then again, maybe not.
> 
> Why not just piss everybody off?
> 
>     return 3 after print $string1, $string2 if $cond;
> 
> honk love forth if.

Don't you mean

honk forth love if

-- 
Piers

Reply via email to