At 08:14 AM 8/3/00 -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote: > >True, but maybe a lower precedance keword is needed like we did > >or || and &&. I think someone suggested "then" > > > print $string1, $string2, "\n" then return 3 if $cond; > > >then again, maybe not. > >Why not just piss everybody off? > > return 3 after print $string1, $string2 if $cond; Shouldn't that be cond if $string1 $string2 print 3 return; and >honk love forth if. forth love? if honk then Forth is postfix, notprefix. >--tom
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Martyn Pearce
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl 6 requirements Steve Fink
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Bart Lateur
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Graham Barr
- Re: perl 6 requirements Tom Christiansen
- Re: perl 6 requirements Buddha Buck
- Re: perl 6 requirements John Porter
- Re: perl 6 requirements Piers Cawley
- Re: perl 6 requirements Bart Lateur
- Re: perl 6 requirements Peter Scott
- Re: perl 6 requirements Graham Barr
- Re: perl 6 requirements Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Graham Barr
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Graham Barr