At 08:14 AM 8/3/00 -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> >True, but maybe a lower precedance keword is needed like we did
> >or || and &&. I think someone suggested "then"
>
> >  print $string1, $string2, "\n" then return 3 if $cond;
>
> >then again, maybe not.
>
>Why not just piss everybody off?
>
>     return 3 after print $string1, $string2 if $cond;

Shouldn't that be

      cond if $string1 $string2 print 3 return;

and

>honk love forth if.

      forth love? if honk then

Forth is postfix, notprefix.


>--tom

Reply via email to