>True, but maybe a lower precedance keword is needed like we did >or || and &&. I think someone suggested "then" > print $string1, $string2, "\n" then return 3 if $cond; >then again, maybe not. Why not just piss everybody off? return 3 after print $string1, $string2 if $cond; honk love forth if. --tom
- Re: perl 6 requirements Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Martyn Pearce
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl 6 requirements Steve Fink
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Bart Lateur
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Graham Barr
- Re: perl 6 requirements Tom Christiansen
- Re: perl 6 requirements Buddha Buck
- Re: perl 6 requirements John Porter
- Re: perl 6 requirements Piers Cawley
- Re: perl 6 requirements Bart Lateur
- Re: perl 6 requirements Peter Scott
- Re: perl 6 requirements Graham Barr
- Re: perl 6 requirements Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Graham Barr
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz