On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 03:07:36PM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote: > I disagree. If there was a bsdm.pm or -B option that gave strong type > checking, then many would be happy. You can do this with attributes and tying. -- Also note that i knew _far_ more about the people that call address mungers names like 'lusers', 'egoists' or try to make luser giraffes. -- Megahal (trained on asr), 1998-11-06
- What is Perl? Nathan Torkington
- Re: What is Perl? Michael Mathews
- Re: What is Perl? Dan Sugalski
- RE: What is Perl? Tony Payne
- Re: What is Perl? Alan Burlison
- Re: What is Perl? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What is Perl? Nathan Torkington
- Re: What is Perl? Simon Cozens
- Re: What is Perl? Matthew Cline
- Re: What is Perl? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: What is Perl? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What is Perl? Piers Cawley
- Re: What is Perl? Bryan C . Warnock
- type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Michael Fowler
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Alan Burlison
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Pe... Alan Burlison
- Re: type-checking [Was: What i... Tim Bunce