Alan Burlison writes: > > The ability to have strong-typing (I don't trust Junior Engineers to get it > > right and I don't have time to check every line of code they write) > > No. No no no no. This approach is fundamentally wrong. (I think I forgot to say this last time, but I'm not speaking with a Voice of Authority now, I'm just someone with an opinion) I disagree. If there was a bsdm.pm or -B option that gave strong type checking, then many would be happy. Sometimes you have to say "ok, you need a different language for this", but sometimes you have to ask whether Perl can make this thing easy too. Nat
- What is Perl? Nathan Torkington
- Re: What is Perl? Michael Mathews
- Re: What is Perl? Dan Sugalski
- RE: What is Perl? Tony Payne
- Re: What is Perl? Alan Burlison
- Re: What is Perl? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What is Perl? Nathan Torkington
- Re: What is Perl? Simon Cozens
- Re: What is Perl? Matthew Cline
- Re: What is Perl? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: What is Perl? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What is Perl? Piers Cawley
- Re: What is Perl? Bryan C . Warnock
- type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Michael Fowler
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Alan Burlison
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Pe... Alan Burlison