On Tuesday 18 July 2006 12:55, jerry gay wrote: > On 7/18/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 18 July 2006 02:21, Audrey Tang wrote: > > > Does r13347 look better? If not, please revert both my changes.
> > I think it's still misleading. #13364 is probably as accurate as Parrot > > can report. > and has the distinction of compiling on windows, too :) # audreyt++ Sorry, I meant #13367. I forgot to push my change. -- c
