On Tuesday 18 July 2006 02:21, Audrey Tang wrote: Hi Audrey,
> Does r13347 look better? If not, please revert both my changes. I think it's still misleading. #13364 is probably as accurate as Parrot can report. > As an aside, regardless of the three changes, this still segfaults: > > ./parrot -D 1 > > as does this: > > ./parrot '' I'll work on those. Thanks for the report. -- c
