On 7/18/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 02:21, Audrey Tang wrote: > Does r13347 look better? If not, please revert both my changes.I think it's still misleading. #13364 is probably as accurate as Parrot can report.
and has the distinction of compiling on windows, too :) # audreyt++ ~jerry
