On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 14:42, Aaron Sherman wrote: > As far as methods go, I would think that the syntax would look exactly > like method invocation, only you would provide an object on which to > call the method, no?
Wow, that was a caffine overdose in progress.... please disregard that incoherent tangle... if I figure out what it was that I was trying to say about both PASM and IMCC at the same time, I'll get back to you :-/ -- Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith "It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!'" -Shriekback
