Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am I right in thinking that IMCC v1 doesn't support objects/methods > currently? And that IMCC v2 will, obviously, but IMCC v2 isn't usable > yet?
Well, there is no special syntax inside imcc. So the first question is: how should such syntax look like, and how shall it translate to PASM? > Tim. leo
