On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Brent Dax wrote: > > Perhaps I wasn't entirely clear. I'm suggesting array-of-symbol-tables > instead of array-of-arrays. It is right now in perl 5, and that isn't changing. How do you think string eval finds lexicals in scope by name now? :) Dan
- Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Stephane Payrard
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Simon Cozens
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Sam Tregar
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Sam Tregar
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski