# -----Original Message----- # From: Simon Cozens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] # Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 4:34 AM # To: Brent Dax # Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Subject: Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? # # # On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 03:13:09AM -0700, Brent Dax wrote: # > Is there any real reason my() variables are stored in a pad # instead of a # > symbol table? # # Recursion. Perhaps I wasn't entirely clear. I'm suggesting array-of-symbol-tables instead of array-of-arrays. --Brent Dax [EMAIL PROTECTED] "...and if the answers are inadequate, the pumpqueen will be overthrown in a bloody coup by programmers flinging dead Java programs over the walls with a trebuchet."
- Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Stephane Payrard
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Simon Cozens
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Sam Tregar
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Sam Tregar
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox