On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 03:13:09AM -0700, Brent Dax wrote: > Is there any real reason my() variables are stored in a pad instead of a > symbol table? Recursion. > It also seems like it would allow us to implement 'my sub'. There's nothing stopping us implementing my sub now, other than wrangling over the semantics. Simon
- Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Stephane Payrard
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Simon Cozens
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Sam Tregar
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Sam Tregar
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox