David L. Nicol wrote: > > Do you agree that they shouldn't get tacked on until execution passes their > definition, unlike END blocks which get appended when they are parsed? Yes, absolutely; that is an important point. END blocks are different because there is only ever one activation record for the file (ignoring threads); lexicals in the file are known at compile time, and so are visible to the END block. Lambdas deserve post blocks too. :-) -- John Porter You can't keep Perl6 Perl5.
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variab... John Porter
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variab... Peter Scott
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variab... David L. Nicol
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variab... Nicholas Clark
- POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-... David L. Nicol
- Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or ... Nicholas Clark
- Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or ... David L. Nicol
- Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or ... Nicholas Clark
- Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or ... Bart Lateur
- Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or ... John Porter
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variab... John Porter
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variab... Glenn Linderman
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable i... Glenn Linderman
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable i... Johan Vromans
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable inste... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of... Bart Lateur
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable inste... Johan Vromans
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable i... John Porter
- Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable i... Ariel Scolnicov
- more POST recitation David L. Nicol
- Re: more POST recitation Ken Fox