Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return"

[Peter Scott]

At 05:07 PM 2/7/01 -0500, John Porter wrote:
>Peter Scott wrote:
> > Sorry, I wasn't clear.  Let me rephrase.  The 'try' helps me determine 
> that
> > the following block is going to be subject to exception handlers which 
> will
> > immediately follow as siblings of the block.
>
>O.k.  That makes sense if some blocks can be try blocks (by adding the
>approprate decoration) and some aren't.
>But I don't see the advantage of it if any and every block is
>implicitly a try block.

Me neither.  I don't want that.

--
Peter Scott
Pacific Systems Design Technologies