Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope)

[John Porter]

Bart Lateur wrote:
> The idea is inspired, not just by the existing BEGIN and END blocks
> syntax, but also by the fact that in 5.6.0, you can put a sub definition
> inside another sub. You can nest them. The effect is that nested sub is
> only visible from within the outer sub. That seems rather appropriate
> here.

Right.  I'm particularly concerned about lexical variables;
a post block ought to have scope to the my vars in the block
to which it pertains.  Sticking it inside lexically makes this
clear.

-- 
John Porter