On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 02:33:53PM -0500, John Porter wrote: > Simon Cozens wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 11:22:35AM -0500, John Porter wrote: > > > [C++] > > > > > It's nearly as portable, > > > > Uhm. Is this actually true? > > I don't know. Sounds reasonable! :-) What did Chip learn from Topaz? (IIRC that was C++) That's hard experience of trying to write perlguts in C++ perl5 is hard experience of trying to write perlguts in C (or C Pre Processor) What was Sapphire's implementation language? What were its lessons? Probably more useful than backwards-forwards polite, well reasoned but ultimately theoretical arguments. [Was it medieval scientists who preferred reasoning to experiments?] Nicholas Clark
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) Piers Cawley
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) Nicholas Clark
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) John Porter
- documenting interfaces (was Re: Meta-design) Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Meta-design Roland Giersig
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Perl6 on handhelds (was Re: Meta-design... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Perl6 on handhelds (was Re: Meta-de... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl6 on handhelds (was Re: Meta-de... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design Sam Tregar