On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Simon Cozens wrote: > On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 11:22:35AM -0500, John Porter wrote: > > [C++] > > > It's nearly as portable, > > Uhm. Is this actually true? C runs pretty much anywhere. > > Are there any non-fragile implementations of C++ yet? Which also brings up another point - choosing anything but C is likely to have a direct impact on our existing userbase. I have a suggestion - if a system compiled and ran Perl 5 then it should be able to compile and run Perl 6. No upgrades required. This is also a good arguement against Java. Many, many systems do not have a Java runtime installed and there's no excuse for putting people through the trouble of installing one just to compile Perl. Are we done yet? -sam
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Perl6 on handhelds (was Re: Me... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Perl6 on handhelds (was Re... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl6 on handhelds (was Re... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design Sam Tregar
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Call for apprentice: was Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- this was only an academic example (was Re: Meta... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Re: Meta-design Nathan Torkington
- Re: Meta-design Daniel Chetlin
- Re: Meta-design Dan Sugalski
- Re: Meta-design Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Meta-design Jarkko Hietaniemi