On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 11:22:35AM -0500, John Porter wrote: > [C++] > It's nearly as portable, Uhm. Is this actually true? C runs pretty much anywhere. Are there any non-fragile implementations of C++ yet? > nearly as fast, Why have nearly as fast, when you can have as fast? > and WAY WAY BETTER to code in. And WAY WAY LESS FAMILIAR to most coders here, at a guess. C is a lingua franca. Let's try and deliberately *lower* the barrier of entry, rather than forcing people to pole-vault. That said, C++ does have *something* going for it. Or at least, I suppose it must have. -- As in certain cults it is possible to kill a process if you know its true name. -- Ken Thompson and Dennis M. Ritchie
- Re: Perl6 compatibility with non-C envi... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl6 compatibility with non-C enviornm... Hildo Biersma
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) Piers Cawley
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) Nicholas Clark
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) John Porter
- documenting interfaces (was Re: Meta-design) Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Meta-design Roland Giersig
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Perl6 on handhelds (was Re: Meta-design... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Perl6 on handhelds (was Re: Meta-de... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl6 on handhelds (was Re: Meta-de... Bradley M. Kuhn