On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 10:14:25PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 06:08 PM 11/2/00 +0000, Simon Cozens wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 11:44:50AM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > > Firstly, now, for the first time in the Perl history, we opened up the
> > > floodgates, so the speak, and had at least some sort of (admittedly)
> > > weakly formalized protocol of submitting ideas for enhancement,
> > > instead of the shark tank known as perl5-porters.
> >
> >perl6-language was not a shark tank?
>
> Not in the p5p sense, at least. Regardless of the levels of disapproval,
> generally the disapproval was voiced with at least some courtesy. p5p is
> rather less polite about things.
I, for one, consider this to be a feature, not a bug.
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.net/
"Darkly hinting of head hitting desk"
-- Megahal (trained on asr), 1998-11-05
