At 03:28 PM 10/23/00 -0500, Garrett Goebel wrote:

>From: Dan Sugalski [<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > (Though if someone comes up with a way to make the
> > platform-dependent bits really small and isolated I'm all for it)
>
>Hmm... I'm 99.9% ignorant on this subject, but doesn't this relate back to 
>past discussions of C--, the portable assembly language? 
>(www.cminusminus.org) I realize C-- isn't just immature, its premature... 
>But there are probably ideas to be gained by sifting through the projects 
>papers and code.

I don't think so--we want perl to generate the executable code directly. If 
we're generating an intermediate language that then gets compiled, we might 
as well use C. (Even though it's rather limited)

I like the idea of returning multiple results in multiple registers. Pity 
nothing on the planet could link to us if we did that... :(

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk

Reply via email to