On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 06:35:55AM +1000, Damian Conway wrote: > You're error is in assuming I have time *now*. > > With 30+ RFCs still to write, I've been seriously contemplating > just abandoning the Perl 6 effort, because added to the demands > of my full-time job, my O'Reilly and other tutorial commitments, > my modules, and my poor long-suffering and cruelly-neglected wife, > the stress is beginning to affect seriously my health. Well, I guess you'll have to abandon the wife and whatever sleep you may get now. ;-) Seriously though, if you're that overloaded, farm out your ideas to other willing souls who may be able to express them as you would in the form of an RFC. Similar with the modules. It'd be a shame to lose your (IMHO) valuable contributions to the Perl 6 effort. -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order function... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Chaim Frenkel