Damian Conway wrote: > > You're error is in assuming I have time *now*. > > With 30+ RFCs still to write, I've been seriously contemplating > just abandoning the Perl 6 effort, because added to the demands > of my full-time job, my O'Reilly and other tutorial commitments, > my modules, and my poor long-suffering and cruelly-neglected wife, > the stress is beginning to affect seriously my health. Damian- I've got a considerable interest in Perl 6, especially its (embedded) OO properties. If there are any RFC's which you have in mind and could send me your notes on, I'd be *more* than happy to help out. I think it would be a shame for some of this stuff to get dumped. But lack of time is a considerable concern, and this should be fun. I'd be glad to help relieve some of your stress. Cheers, Nate
- RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order function... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions Chaim Frenkel