Re: RFC 23 (v3) Higher order functions

[Damian Conway]

   > So perhaps you should ask people to contribute implementation notes
   > sections to your RFCs rather than entire RFCs? And no sense in requiring
   > that for the initial version, though a solicitation in the text of the
   > RFC itself might hasten their appearance.

I thought that was what "S.E.P." implied :-)
But again, I'm happy if people want to contribute IMPLEMENTATION detail.

Though I rather thought that I'd prefer to nail down the interface,
hand it on to the wizards over in -internals, and run away very quickly.

Damian