Peter Scott wrote: > At 05:33 PM 8/15/00 -0400, John Porter wrote: > >The thing I don't like about C++/Java try/catch syntax is the way > >the blocks are daisychained. That is not intuitive to the flow. > > I find it quite intuitive :-) I note the smiley. > What interpretation should be placed on statements in the try block > following a catch block? Whatever you want. I can think of three possibilities. -- John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Glenn Linderman
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Peter Scott
- Re: English language basis for "throw&qu... John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Tony Olekshy
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Chaim Frenkel
- Re: English language basis for "throw&qu... Graham Barr
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Piers Cawley
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Peter Scott
- Re: English language basis for "throw&qu... John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "thro... Peter Scott
- Re: English language basis for "... John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" David L. Nicol